requestId:68499ac03db751.27201703.
Analysis on the academic construction problems between Mencius and “Age”
Author: Wang Xiao
Source: Hengshui College Newspaper, 2018, Issue 6
Time: Confucius II The 16th day of Wuxu month of Wuxu
� The key figure who built the network is in the era of King Xuan in the late years of Mencius. Under the comfort of Jixia’s civilization and the destruction of politics, Mencius gave “Year” a more complete academic quality. From then on, “Year” was “meaning” from “things” to “meaning”, and became a special name for learning as Confucius’s teachings. After that, it explored its internal “recitation method” and subtle meaning, which became the mainstream method of verbal commentary.
Keywords: Mencius; “Year”; Study; History
Author introduction: Wang Xiao (1971-), male, from Chang, Jiangxi, Master Fan, Major School of History and Civilization and Games, Associate Professor, Doctor of History.
In the history of “Year”, Mencius was a key figure. From a specific perspective, it is precisely based on his series of commentaries that “Age” begins to have a more complete academic quality [1]. Therefore, when studying the structure of “Year”, we cannot discuss Mencius. So, why did Mencius build a study on “Age”? What is the specific situation? The author mainly focuses on the world-renowned literature. In comparison with the unearthed literature, he uses knowledge of the social sciences to understand the theory of social science, and uses the evaluation of the evolution of texts and internal and external causes to restore the historical facts of the Mencius era. He briefly describes this problem and provides a correct understanding of the Fang family [2].
1. Mencius established the study of “Year”
We believe that in the late study, the Mencius era was used as the water mortal. Through the hands of Mencius, the nature of “Year” changed, and the academic temperament was established.
1. From the perspective of academic characteristics, Mencius played a major influence in this. In general, academic characteristics should be prepared by Confucius, given me a wonderful principle, and thus endured thousands of times. As for “Age”, such characteristics were not prepared before Mencius, and at most they were insufficient. Even if they had their “reality”, their “form” – a complete academic form, has not yet appeared. Reviewing “Theory”, you can find that Confucius’s “Prayer”, “Book”, “Lecture”, “Lecture”, “Lecture”, “Lecture”, “Lecture”, “Lecture”, “As for what I said, I have not said a word about “Year”. In the late war, when discussing with Mozi, who was the most determined to fight against Confucianism, Confucian scholars made great contributions to Confucius in “Penadies”, “Books”, “Treasures”, “Treasures”, “Treasures”, “Treasures”, “Treasures”, but they also did not say a word about “Generations” [3]. In short, the academic quality of “Year” is not refreshing. It was only when it was Mencius that “Year” was full of meaning and Confucius’s work “Year” was realized. This is what “Mencius: Teng Wengong II” called “Confucius became “Year” and was a minister who paid vain.”
2. In the process of learning in “Year”, Mencius transformed “Year” from “event” to “meaning”, and its connotation was deepened and extended
There is existing data, and the academic form has appeared before Mencius. One of the main reasons is that there are six projects in Guodian Chu. Li Xueqin pointed out: “The long-term care of Guodian Chu will never be later than 300 BC, which is earlier than the seven chapters of “Mencius” written by Mencius, so these are what Mencius could read, and six books have already existed.”[1] Review Guodian Chu, “Pen”, “Book”, “Letter, “Lecture”, “Year” and “Year” at the same time href=”https://twsugarblog.org/”>Baobao.com It is indeed a very important fact to pay attention to. From this we can presume that before Mencius, the six texts had become a system. However, the other side is that compared with the strict academic discussions in later generations, they are still a bit rough and reflect that the academic situation has not yet been finalized. Among them, in terms of this issue, the most noteworthy thing is the brief article 官网‘s notion about “Year”: “So it happens to ancient and modern things.” [2]
It is well known that before becoming a book, “Year” was the name of a historical book. As a special name for history and also a historical statistic [4], although it has the meaning of being guided by the verdict [5]investigating software, its orientation is undoubtedly historical, not academic. To put it more specifically, as the historical “Year”, it highlights the historical facts, that is, the so-called “things” and the ancient and modern integration of “things”. The “Year” in his studies highlights its “meaning”, and history is just a prophecy. This point is explained by Mencius: “The “Cheng” of Chu, the “Jing” of Chu, and the “Year” of Lu, are the same; the matter is the “Zhihuan and the “Year” of the text, Confucius said: ‘The meaning of the “Qiu is taken away by Qiu Qing.” In other words, “Year” was reformed by “Lu Nian”, and its original and the “Year” are the original and the “Year”The “Cheng” and the “Jingwu” of Chu are the same types, and they record historical events from various countries. However, after Confucius’ reform, it relied on the historical basis of the Qihuan and the Wendi industry of the age, and what is really about to be revealed is the subtle meaning after the literal meaning. It can be seen that after Mencius, the highlights or specially emphasized in “Year” are “Tao Name” (“Zangzi·National”), “Talk is the subtle” (“Xunzi·Ru Xiao”), and “right and wrong” (“Year Fanlu·Jade Cup”), and historical facts are nothing but “Tao” and not the subject.
However, when Guo Dianzi talks about “Year”, it not only highlights its “things”, but also “ancient and modern times”. What does this explain? It proved that the 平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平� Therefore, the “Year” referred to here should not be the work described by Confucius, but the historical book “Year” of the pre-Confucian era. The reason why this conclusion is established is that in addition to its tendency to “things” rather than “meaning”, it can also be seen from its “willing ancient and modern times” that it has exceeded the time scope of “things of Qihuan and Wen”, so it can only be the historical book “Year”, rather than the later meaning of “Year”. Because in the war era, the so-called “now” is, “Oh, then your mother should be very excited when she knows it.” Jung Ju sighed, “The lower limit of time is age, that is, age is “now”, and age is “ancient”. As the “Korean Fazi·Five Worms” says: “In ancient times, they competed with morality, and the Middle Ages were pursued by wisdom, and now they competed with energy and strength. “And citing Zi Zheng and Xu Yan of the age era as examples to illustrate the value orientation of “present”. Therefore, the “Age” stated in “Age” is based on “present events” and cannot enter “ancient events”. Then, “Age” that “will know the events of ancient times” can only be broad, and it belongs to the nature of historical books.
Therefore, the author believes that in the Guodian era, although the text of the six series has gradually taken shape, the internal academic structure has not been finally completed, especially “Age” 》, it also stays in the meaning of “history”, and is far beyond the present “Year” and is a generalized name for late historical books. As long as Mencius appeared, “Year” was “meaning” from “events” to “meaning” and became a special name for academics. After t
發佈留言